Thursday, June 09, 2005
Kinsey Scale
In the late 1940's, Dr. Alfred Kinsey and his associates developed the Kinsey scale. This was the first time anyone argued that there is not a simple black-and-white dichotomy between gay and straight. The scale is on a six-point system as follows:
0 - exclusively heterosexual
1 - predominantly heterosexual, incidentally homoexual
2 - predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3 - equally heterosexual and homosexual
4 - predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5 - predominantly homosexual, incidentally heterosexual
6 - exclusively homosexual
While I find this scale useful, I would argue that sexuality is even more fluid than that. For me, personally, my sexuality has moved up and down this scale at various points in my life.
Before adolescence, I had my first several serious crushes on girls. Perhaps I was close to a 6. I was crushed out on a doll-like beauty in my fourth grade class. Then I was crushed out on the rebel girl in my fifth grade class. And I was crushed out on one of the soccer players on an opposing team in the sixth grade.
Then as I hit adolescence, I was more of a 1. I was intensely crushed out on Steve of Opening Pandora's Box in the eighth grade.
By ninth grade, I was heading back up towards a 3. Although I was involved with Brian, I was having frequent fantasies of a girl in one of my classes. At that time, I'd read that Marilyn Monroe had had a lesbian affair with her acting coach and suddenly I thought that liking girls must be okay.
In the tenth grade, I continued to see Brian and was involved in a series of very unsatisfying relationships with "boyfriends."
In the eleventh grade, I had my first girlfriend. During the two years of that relationship, I decided that I wasn't homosexual nor heterosexual, I was just sexual. I refused to pin myself down to a point on the Kinsey scale, finding the whole thing irrelevant.
When that girlfriend and I broke up, I was devastated. This was the time of the Alex incident. I decided women were too heart-breaking, so I made a deliberate decision to date men.
This was the summer after I graduated from high school. And this was perhaps the only time I fell seriously in love with a man. We had incredible sex as well as a very deep emotional connection. However, I'd say I was pretty firmly a 3 at this time. As we both got ready to leave for college, we started to become more emotionally distant and I suggested we start seeing other people. I dated both men and women casually, but ended up leaving this beloved man for a woman.
In college, I quickly decided to label myself a lesbian for political reasons. I was attending a very pro-feminist college and figured outing myself would increase my chances of finding a girlfriend. However, in the two years that I dated this woman, I think I had an equal number of affairs with men as I had with women. I changed my self-identity to being a "lesbian who sleeps with men." Again, putting me around a 3 or a 4. After our two year relationship ended, I had two male boyfriends/lovers - well, one was a transvestite, and two more girlfriends/lovers, before getting seriously involved with my current partner.
After college, however, my present partner and I broke up for a few years while she finished college and I got my career off the ground. During that time, I only dated women. I was very rarely attracted to men. And even when I was, I was not interested in pursuing anything with them. I'd say I was a full 6 from 1993 to 2003. (Shit! I'm giving away my age here, huh?). ;-)
Then in 2003, the boyfriend from 3 paragraphs ago (summer after high school) reappeared in my life - on-line.
Do you all really care about all this? LOL.
Anyway, I still love that man and probably always will. This realization forced me to come to terms with the fact that despite the last ten years of being with women exclusively, I am not so firmly a six on that scale as I'd come to think of myself. At least not now, in 2005.
I still love C more than anyone or anything else in the world. And I feel incredibly blessed that she agreed to commit to spending a life with me on September 6 of 1997. And even more blessed that she loves me for who I am - whether at that moment I'm a 6 or a 3. :-) And we still have the best sex of my life. ;-)
So that was a long, long answer to a number of questions that showed up in the comments section of my last post.
So... Am I confused? Yes, still at times. It would be much easier to be a six or a zero. (I didn't make up those numbers, Kinsey did, so don't blame me for straight equalling zero). :-)
Is confusion the only reason I've been interested in men in my life? Obviously not.
Does my fluid sexuality make friendships complicated at times? Hell, yes.
Do I still get crushes on both men and women? Undoubtedly yes.
Thanks again for all the stimulating questions in response to that last post. And now for you:
Where do you think you are on the Kinsey scale and do you think that has ever changed during the course of your life? Hey, maybe I should do a new survey in my sidebar on this. ;-)
0 - exclusively heterosexual
1 - predominantly heterosexual, incidentally homoexual
2 - predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3 - equally heterosexual and homosexual
4 - predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5 - predominantly homosexual, incidentally heterosexual
6 - exclusively homosexual
While I find this scale useful, I would argue that sexuality is even more fluid than that. For me, personally, my sexuality has moved up and down this scale at various points in my life.
Before adolescence, I had my first several serious crushes on girls. Perhaps I was close to a 6. I was crushed out on a doll-like beauty in my fourth grade class. Then I was crushed out on the rebel girl in my fifth grade class. And I was crushed out on one of the soccer players on an opposing team in the sixth grade.
Then as I hit adolescence, I was more of a 1. I was intensely crushed out on Steve of Opening Pandora's Box in the eighth grade.
By ninth grade, I was heading back up towards a 3. Although I was involved with Brian, I was having frequent fantasies of a girl in one of my classes. At that time, I'd read that Marilyn Monroe had had a lesbian affair with her acting coach and suddenly I thought that liking girls must be okay.
In the tenth grade, I continued to see Brian and was involved in a series of very unsatisfying relationships with "boyfriends."
In the eleventh grade, I had my first girlfriend. During the two years of that relationship, I decided that I wasn't homosexual nor heterosexual, I was just sexual. I refused to pin myself down to a point on the Kinsey scale, finding the whole thing irrelevant.
When that girlfriend and I broke up, I was devastated. This was the time of the Alex incident. I decided women were too heart-breaking, so I made a deliberate decision to date men.
This was the summer after I graduated from high school. And this was perhaps the only time I fell seriously in love with a man. We had incredible sex as well as a very deep emotional connection. However, I'd say I was pretty firmly a 3 at this time. As we both got ready to leave for college, we started to become more emotionally distant and I suggested we start seeing other people. I dated both men and women casually, but ended up leaving this beloved man for a woman.
In college, I quickly decided to label myself a lesbian for political reasons. I was attending a very pro-feminist college and figured outing myself would increase my chances of finding a girlfriend. However, in the two years that I dated this woman, I think I had an equal number of affairs with men as I had with women. I changed my self-identity to being a "lesbian who sleeps with men." Again, putting me around a 3 or a 4. After our two year relationship ended, I had two male boyfriends/lovers - well, one was a transvestite, and two more girlfriends/lovers, before getting seriously involved with my current partner.
After college, however, my present partner and I broke up for a few years while she finished college and I got my career off the ground. During that time, I only dated women. I was very rarely attracted to men. And even when I was, I was not interested in pursuing anything with them. I'd say I was a full 6 from 1993 to 2003. (Shit! I'm giving away my age here, huh?). ;-)
Then in 2003, the boyfriend from 3 paragraphs ago (summer after high school) reappeared in my life - on-line.
Do you all really care about all this? LOL.
Anyway, I still love that man and probably always will. This realization forced me to come to terms with the fact that despite the last ten years of being with women exclusively, I am not so firmly a six on that scale as I'd come to think of myself. At least not now, in 2005.
I still love C more than anyone or anything else in the world. And I feel incredibly blessed that she agreed to commit to spending a life with me on September 6 of 1997. And even more blessed that she loves me for who I am - whether at that moment I'm a 6 or a 3. :-) And we still have the best sex of my life. ;-)
So that was a long, long answer to a number of questions that showed up in the comments section of my last post.
So... Am I confused? Yes, still at times. It would be much easier to be a six or a zero. (I didn't make up those numbers, Kinsey did, so don't blame me for straight equalling zero). :-)
Is confusion the only reason I've been interested in men in my life? Obviously not.
Does my fluid sexuality make friendships complicated at times? Hell, yes.
Do I still get crushes on both men and women? Undoubtedly yes.
Thanks again for all the stimulating questions in response to that last post. And now for you:
Where do you think you are on the Kinsey scale and do you think that has ever changed during the course of your life? Hey, maybe I should do a new survey in my sidebar on this. ;-)
Comments:
Heck, that was candid. I like the fact that you came to terms with "simply being sexual". It's a confidence issue. Some flowers just don't like to be touched.
I recently spoke to a friend whose sexual identity can be only defined as confused (there are many more issues in his life that make his sexuality "un-pinnable"). He told me his current partner spoke about how he is heteroflexible. I laughed for a moment and then found that quite an interesting definition.
As far as I'm concerned, I think I'm probably a 2 most of the time with peaks of 3 and 0. In reality, I've always believed there's a gay man trapped in my uber-feminine body. If Eddie Izzard (my idol!) is a male lesbian, what does this make me?
Thank you for your candor!
As far as I'm concerned, I think I'm probably a 2 most of the time with peaks of 3 and 0. In reality, I've always believed there's a gay man trapped in my uber-feminine body. If Eddie Izzard (my idol!) is a male lesbian, what does this make me?
Thank you for your candor!
Chameleo - Interesting analogy to flowers. I'm not sure I get it, though. I can be a little slow at times. I'll have to sit with that one for a bit.
Exile - Well, that would be one way to put it. ;-)
Ro - I like that definition. Perhaps I am homoflexible. ;-) I can definitely relate to feeling like a gay man trapped in a woman's body.
JennyNYC - Really? That surprises me. I would have put you at a 5.
Tesco - LOL. Football player, huh?
Transience - Thanks. *blushing*
Milktea - yeah, sometimes I feel like a cat with 9 lives. ;-)
Jax - yes, generally labels are way too constrictive
Neel - I *haven't* seen it yet. Have you? If so, did you like it? I think JennyNYC saw it - didn't you? But I will have to see it soon. BTW - I like your new profile pic. ;-)
Exile - Well, that would be one way to put it. ;-)
Ro - I like that definition. Perhaps I am homoflexible. ;-) I can definitely relate to feeling like a gay man trapped in a woman's body.
JennyNYC - Really? That surprises me. I would have put you at a 5.
Tesco - LOL. Football player, huh?
Transience - Thanks. *blushing*
Milktea - yeah, sometimes I feel like a cat with 9 lives. ;-)
Jax - yes, generally labels are way too constrictive
Neel - I *haven't* seen it yet. Have you? If so, did you like it? I think JennyNYC saw it - didn't you? But I will have to see it soon. BTW - I like your new profile pic. ;-)
When the Kinsey scale was developed, being homosexual, or entertaining homosexual thoughts, was something NO ONE talked about openly, and few privately. Therefore, the scale is severely limited based on what they saw at that time. I do believe a new scale would probably run from 1 to 20 at least.
i like jax's comment. i agree with him. why must we categorize everyone. like you said, sexuality is fluid. just go with the flow.
(i've been wanting to see that movie.)
great post.
(i've been wanting to see that movie.)
great post.
interesting post, enjoyed reading it. 'just being sexual'...nothing makes for more simple sweet joy.
Thanks about the pic. No, I havent seen it yet, but I will soon. I have been inspired by this post though, would you mind if I link to it in something I write?
Post a Comment